From the way in which “Last Ride” has slunk into cinemas with little buzz and a meaningless poster the hopes for a thrill ride were not high. Sure enough, “Last Ride” is yet another addition to the Australian canon of mopey, maudlin films about dysfunctional arseholes. Hugo Weaving does his best with the threadbare character Kev, and Tom Russell is passable playing his son Chook (though allowances should be made for child actors given their inherent lack of experience.)
But the story is the real villain here, an ill-defined, stop-start road journey across some admittedly picturesque South Australian countryside. Because the writer has chosen to slowly drip-feed the details of why the pair are on run, the stakes are never clear or compelling. Kev and Chook spend vast amounts of time sitting around, with little sense of danger or risk enveloping them. Coupled with the low stakes is the decision to make Kev a short-tempered, violent thug, so that even the most sympathetic of audiences would find it hard to care for his fate.
So how is it that we keep churning out these low-scale dramaless dramas that have no clear reason to exist as feature films? Here’s two explanations:
- Often short films with more mood than substance are lauded by film festivals, hence the praise for director Glendyn Ivin’s short “Cracker Bag” which won the Palme D’Or at Cannes. Taking the same approach from shorts to features exposes the weaknesses of this type of storytelling. As with “Samson and Delilah” (see thoughts below), the story content in “Last Ride” could have been told in half the screen time, so we are left with long scenes of nothing much that limp the film towards 90 minutes.
- Critics often applaud films of this nature and very few have the guts to call filmmakers to task. Hence the predictable hyperbole from the “At The Movies” duo, though Jake Ryan in The Age gives a more reasonable appraisal. Honest criticism from within the film industry is rare (no doubt “Last Ride” will feature prominently in this year’s AFI awards), so the filmmakers are rarely being told directly about their work’s shortcomings.
Ultimately though the key source of the problem is the filmmakers themselves, with their lack of storytelling ambition and nous. The upcoming “The Road” may provide a fascinating case study of how an Australian director working in the Hollywood system tells a father/son road journey, with stakes that are as high as their very own survival.
I am really curious - what constitutes "honest criticism", as opposed to "dishonest criticism"?
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed Last Ride - and Samson & Delilah - for their atmosphere, great performances (i totally disagree about Tom Russell), cinematography, and characters - but then, i wouldn't describe Kev as a threadbare character or as merely a violent short-tempered thug. Scenes like the waterhole scene (the second one) show different elements of his character at play, and go to the heart of what this film is about - it's not a high stakes chase film, it's not a thriller - it's about fathers and sons, and the narrative trajectory is a boy growing up over the course of a road trip. I thought it was really effective.
Thanks for your comment Deej. Just to clarify what I mean by "honest criticism" in the context above - I think it is rare for fellow filmmakers within the industry to share their real views about the shortcomings of a film, so filmmakers are often left with the false impression that their films are better than they are. I'm not specifically referring to critics, though the industry is not done any favours if there's a suspicion that local films get bonus points from particular Australian critics.
ReplyDeleteI'll ponder your thoughts on Kev. I agree that there is some light and shade in his character, but it does irritate me that filmmakers keep going back to the same type of emotionally repressed, short-tempered Australian male. It's got to the point that a character like Kev has almost become a cliche.
Think you might be confusing story with plot and drama with action. Yes it is low on plot and low on action, but not story or drama.
ReplyDeleteThe journey is not vague. Chook comes to an understanding of who he is and makes a pretty spectacular decision for one so young at the films conclusion. Its crystal clear. Perhaps you should watch a sat nav instead of a movie. ;)
The stakes aren't low. The stakes in this film for Chook hinge on his identity. Last time I looked, identity trumps life in the stakes camp. How many wars fought and lives lost in the name of identity.
Really all you are saying is that this film is a low concept film (as opposed to a high concept film). Its kinda like accusing a zebra of being a zebra.
Anyway thats my 5¢
Take care.
Hi Film Heckler,
ReplyDeleteI know how you feel. It makes me so angry when I see a film like 'The Last Ride' because I think about all those master filmmakers who struggled valiantly to get their films made - and then we seem to give Australian filmmakers all the support and opportunity they could ever want for and they go out and make these irrelevant, boring films that feel like they've been made by someone who HATES cinema.
The big problem with this film is that Chook has no agency. He is utterly passive, inert and helpless. He is trapped from the very opening sequence and we know it. It's a very tedious and frustrating setup. Like that rabbit who's bleeding to death, and how we're suppose to feel sorry for him. But the cruel fact is that suffering in itself is not dramatic or interesting. If it was the world would be different.
And then I think, what's going to happen when the next Peter Weir does actually come around - you're totally right - audiences aren't going to trust reviews of Australian movies as they've so often had no semblance to reality. They're running out of stars to rate with.
But I do also think it is a little disingenuous of you to use a pseudonym. And also - if you really care enough about great films, go make one.
Hugo